From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 18 14:58:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4976E37B407; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.gnf.org (ns1.gnf.org [63.196.132.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5F243FE1; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:58:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: from EXCHCLUSTER01.lj.gnf.org (exch02.lj.gnf.org [172.25.10.20]) by ns1.gnf.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3ILwUZu021864; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:58:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: from roark.gnf.org ([172.25.24.15]) by EXCHCLUSTER01.lj.gnf.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:58:31 -0700 Received: from roark.gnf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roark.gnf.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3ILwVZc027136; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:58:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: (from gtetlow@localhost) by roark.gnf.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3ILwVY0027135; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:58:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:58:31 -0700 From: Gordon Tetlow To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20030418215831.GP9682@roark.gnf.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jigfid2yHjNFZUTO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2003 21:58:31.0998 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6CB65E0:01C305F5] cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys proc.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:58:33 -0000 --jigfid2yHjNFZUTO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 02:30:33PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, John Baldwin wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > I think here there is room for more input at the design stage. Perhaps > > that is happening on threads@ (which I'm not reading ATM, E2MUCHEMAIL)? > > I just would like to the see the design hammered out before a lot of > > code gets written as it is easier to change the design when you don't > > have a pile of code already depending on it. >=20 > All the design was done aboth 6 months ago on the KSE mailing list. > unfortunatly all that went straight out the window when the > signal masks were moved from the process to the thread. If this is the case, why isn't there a new design for others to review rather than committing something without any supporting code around it? Fields should generally be introduced when they are going to be used. -gordon --jigfid2yHjNFZUTO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+oHUHRu2t9DV9ZfsRAjawAJ9YCAcC/OFEZYGOkEN1rkhftaYSbgCgwSkO Indf/nkR+8fS8WVGHUbl+sA= =1to8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jigfid2yHjNFZUTO--