From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 27 18:17:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6BD16A4BF for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mercury.ll.net (mercury.ll.net [209.131.224.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5846443FE3 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:17:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from supraexpress@globaleyes.net) Received: from globaleyes.net (unverified [209.131.254.143]) by mercury.ll.net (Vircom SMTPRS 2.1.258) with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 20:13:16 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 20:13:07 -0500 (CDT) From: supraexpress@globaleyes.net To: PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au In-Reply-To: <20030827091406.GB77912@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup failing with "ASSERT failed" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:17:48 -0000 Ummm, well, when you have a hidden ELF who keeps multiplying all of those ridiculus numbers by 10, of course! ;) It should have been 2GB - oh well. On 27 Aug, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:02:08PM -0500, supraexpress@globaleyes.net wrote: >>A couple of times, now, on both FBSD-5.1-CURRENT and FBSD-4.8-STABLE whilst >>running with 2MB of RAM, cvsup has "croaked" with the following error: > > Out of interest, how do you get either 4.x or 5.x to run in 2MB? I > found running 2.x in 4MB was painful and my 4.x kernel is more than 2MB. > > Peter