Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:21:01 -0800 (PST)
From:      wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG (Bill Paul)
To:        asmodai@wxs.nl (Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai)
Cc:        archie@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_ethersubr.c
Message-ID:  <20010208232101.8135E37C191@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010208235146.E50305@daemon.ninth-circle.org> from Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai at "Feb 8, 2001 11:51:46 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -On [20010208 19:00], Archie Cobbs (archie@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
> >  Log:
> >  When we receive an incoming Ethernet frame that was unicast to a
> >  different hardware address, we should drop it (this should only
> >  happen in promiscuous mode).
> 
> You mean:
> 
> In promiscuous mode we don't drop it?  Whilst in normal mode we drop the
> erroneous unicast frame?
> 
> The sentence is a bit ambiguous to my eyes, hence the call for
> clarification.

I'm hoping he means: "this should only happen if the IFF_PROMISC flag
is set on the interface." Sounds like a sanity check to me -- ideally
the driver should not let this happen -- but I agree, this explanation
should be clearer.

-Bill 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010208232101.8135E37C191>