From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 26 00:18:41 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A124B16A47B for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF7213C45B for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 10763 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2007 23:51:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2007 23:51:17 -0000 Message-ID: <46A7E417.5040800@123.com.sv> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:00:23 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: porteasy vs portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:18:41 -0000 Hi, i used to use portupgrade as using this instructions http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/11/29/Big_Scary_Daemons.html for doing all the port managing, what about porteasy, it is as good as portupgrade? i think porteasy is not as popular as portupgrade. thanks