2010/freebsd-arch/20100404.freebsd-arch
Messages: 53, sorted by author
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:14:28 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Apr 1 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: Newbie question: kernel image a dynamically linked binary? 2. Apr 1 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: Newbie question: kernel image a dynamically linked binary? 3. Apr 1 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: Removing support for NOFOO 4. Apr 1 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: [RFC] Reduce namespace pollution on zlib.h 5. Apr 2 Adam Vande More Re: Results of BIND RFC 6. Apr 1 Alexander Leidinger Re: CTF patch for testing/review 7. Mar 30 Alexander Leidinger Re: CTF patch for testing/review 8. Apr 2 Andrey V. Elsukov Re: Results of BIND RFC 9. Apr 3 Andriy Gapon Re: touch panel support 10. Apr 3 Arseny Nasokin Re: Results of BIND RFC 11. Apr 3 Arseny Nasokin Re: Results of BIND RFC 12. Apr 2 Charles Sprickman Re: Results of BIND RFC 13. Apr 2 Daniel Eischen Re: Results of BIND RFC 14. Mar 31 Daniel Eischen Re: Versioned symbols: what can we deal with move between two symbols? 15. Apr 1 Daniel Rodrick Newbie question: kernel image a dynamically linked binary? 16. Apr 2 Denny Lin Re: Results of BIND RFC 17. Apr 2 Doug Barton Re: Results of BIND RFC 18. Apr 1 Doug Barton Results of BIND RFC 19. Apr 2 Doug Hardie Re: Results of BIND RFC 20. Apr 2 Erik Trulsson Re: Results of BIND RFC
21. Apr 2 Freddie Cash Re: Results of BIND RFC 22. Mar 29 FreeBSD bugmaster Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org 23. Apr 1 Gary Jennejohn Re: Newbie question: kernel image a dynamically linked binary? 24. Apr 1 Gleb Kurtsou Namecache improvements (Summer of Code proposal) 25. Apr 2 Guido Falsi Re: Results of BIND RFC 26. Apr 3 Ian Smith Re: Results of BIND RFC 27. Apr 2 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Results of BIND RFC 28. Apr 1 John Baldwin Re: Newbie question: kernel image a dynamically linked binary? 29. Apr 2 Kevin Oberman Re: Results of BIND RFC 30. Apr 1 M. Warner Losh Re: CTF patch for testing/review 31. Apr 2 M. Warner Losh Re: Removing support for NOFOO 32. Apr 1 M. Warner Losh Removing support for NOFOO 33. Apr 1 Oliver Fromme Re: Newbie question: kernel image a dynamically linked binary? 34. Apr 2 Peter Jeremy Re: Results of BIND RFC 35. Apr 1 Peter Thoenen Re: Results of BIND RFC 36. Mar 31 Pietro Cerutti Re: [RFC] Reduce namespace pollution on zlib.h 37. Mar 31 Pietro Cerutti Re: [RFC] Reduce namespace pollution on zlib.h 38. Apr 2 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: Results of BIND RFC 39. Apr 2 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: Results of BIND RFC 40. Apr 2 Randy Bush Re: Results of BIND RFC
41. Apr 2 Randy Bush Re: Results of BIND RFC 42. Apr 2 Reko Turja Re: Results of BIND RFC 43. Apr 2 Reko Turja Re: Results of BIND RFC 44. Apr 2 Robert Watson Re: Results of BIND RFC 45. Apr 3 Ruben de Groot Re: Results of BIND RFC 46. Apr 2 Stanislav Sedov Re: Results of BIND RFC 47. Apr 2 Stanislav Sedov Re: Results of BIND RFC 48. Apr 2 Stanislav Sedov Re: Results of BIND RFC 49. Apr 2 Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZ Re: Removing support for NOFOO 50. Mar 31 Xin LI Re: [RFC] Reduce namespace pollution on zlib.h 51. Mar 31 Xin LI Versioned symbols: what can we deal with move between two symbols? 52. Apr 2 jhell Re: Results of BIND RFC 53. Apr 2 sthaug@nethelp.no Re: Results of BIND RFC
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date