2016/freebsd-net/20160131.freebsd-net
Messages: 86, sorted by author
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:18:56 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Jan 24 =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard= Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 2. Jan 24 Adrian Chadd Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 3. Jan 24 Adrian Chadd Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 4. Jan 24 Adrian Chadd Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 5. Jan 27 Alfred Perlstein Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 6. Jan 24 Andrey V. Elsukov Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 7. Jan 24 Ben Woods Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 8. Jan 24 Ben Woods Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 9. Jan 25 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 10. Jan 27 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 11. Jan 27 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 12. Jan 27 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 13. Jan 26 Daniel Eischen Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 14. Jan 28 Daniel Eischen Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 15. Jan 28 Eric van Gyzen Intel I219-V Support? 16. Jan 24 Gary Jennejohn Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 17. Jan 26 Gary Jennejohn Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 18. Jan 27 Gary Jennejohn Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 19. Jan 25 Ian Smith Re: ipfw NAT /etc/rc.firewall question 20. Jan 27 Kevin Oberman Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
21. Jan 24 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 22. Jan 26 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 23. Jan 27 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 24. Jan 29 Kubilay Kocak Re: Intel I219-V Support? 25. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 26. Jan 26 Luigi Rizzo Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 27. Jan 26 Luigi Rizzo Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 28. Jan 27 Luigi Rizzo Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 29. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 30. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 31. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 32. Jan 26 Luigi Rizzo Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 33. Jan 29 Luigi Rizzo Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 34. Jan 29 Luigi Rizzo Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 35. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 36. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 37. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 38. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 39. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 40. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
41. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 42. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 43. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 44. Jan 24 Marko Zec Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 45. Jan 27 Michael McConville Undefined shift overflow in dhclient(8) 46. Jan 24 Navdeep Parhar Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 47. Jan 24 Navdeep Parhar Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 48. Jan 26 Pavel Odintsov Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 49. Jan 25 Phabricator [Differential] [Closed] D4972: hyperv/hn: Partly rework transmission path 50. Jan 25 Phabricator [Differential] [Closed] D4977: hyperv/hn: Use m_copydata for chimney sending. 51. Jan 28 Pieper, Jeffrey E RE: Intel I219-V Support? 52. Jan 29 Pieper, Jeffrey E RE: Intel I219-V Support? 53. Jan 25 Russell L. Carter Re: ipfw NAT /etc/rc.firewall question 54. Jan 25 Russell L. Carter ipfw NAT /etc/rc.firewall question 55. Jan 27 Sean Bruno em/igb CFT 56. Jan 29 Xiaoye Sun Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 57. Jan 29 Xiaoye Sun Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 58. Jan 29 Xiaoye Sun Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 59. Jan 25 Xiaoye Sun swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 60. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention
61. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 161277] [em] [patch] BMC cannot receive IPMI traffic after loading or enabling the if_em driver 62. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 193452] Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadcom) 63. Jan 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 194485] Userland cannot add IPv6 prefix routes 64. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 195078] em tx_dma_fails and dropped packets 65. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 199174] em tx and rx hang 66. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 200221] em0 watchdog timeout under load 67. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 203524] TCP checksum failed on igb network adapter 68. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low 69. Jan 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low 70. Jan 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low 71. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206494] lock order reversal (sleepable after non-sleepable) in in_mcast.c/bxe.c 72. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 73. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 74. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 75. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 76. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 77. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 78. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Intel I219-V in 11-CURRENT and 10-STABLE 79. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Missing Intel I219-V support in 10-STABLE and 11-CURRENT 80. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Missing Intel I219-V support in 10-STABLE and 11-CURRENT
81. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Missing Intel I219-V support in 10-STABLE and 11-CURRENT 82. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Missing Intel I219-V support in 10-STABLE and 11-CURRENT 83. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206567] [msk] msk0: watchdog timeout - 88E8053 on i386 84. Jan 26 sepherosa_gmail.com (Sephe [Differential] [Request, 136 lines] D5074: hyperv/hn: Improve sending performance 85. Jan 28 sepherosa_gmail.com (Sephe [Differential] [Request, 217 lines] D5098: hyperv/hn: Reorganize TX csum offloading 86. Jan 28 sepherosa_gmail.com (Sephe [Differential] [Request, 5 lines] D5099: hyperv/hn: Enable IP header checksum offloading
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date