Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2006/freebsd-amd64/20060129.freebsd-amd64

Messages: 74, old messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:13:47 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Jan 22 <pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.c amd64 vs x86_64
  2. Jan 22 Steve Kargl                Re: amd64 vs x86_64
  3. Jan 22 <pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.c Re: amd64 vs x86_64
  4. Jan 22 Steve Kargl                Re: amd64 vs x86_64
  5. Jan 23 FreeBSD bugmaster          Current problem reports assigned to you
  6. Jan 24 Ken Gunderson              dual vs single core opteron 100's
  7. Jan 24 Lars Tunkrans              Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
  8. Jan 24 Ken Gunderson              Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
  9. Jan 24 Lars Tunkrans              Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 10. Jan 24 Matthew D. Fuller          Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 11. Jan 24 Ken Gunderson              Tyan K8SRE
 12. Jan 24 Peter Jeremy               Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 13. Jan 24 Richard MAHONEY            Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 14. Jan 24 Ken Gunderson              Re: Tyan GT24 - Thunder K8SRE mainboard
 15. Jan 24 Erich Dollansky            Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 16. Jan 25 Matthew D. Fuller          Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 17. Jan 25 FreeBSD Tinderbox          [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
 18. Jan 25 Jeff Anton                 Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 19. Jan 26 Clifford Cawthon           amd64/92337: FreeBsd 6.0 Release Intel Pro 1000 MT em1 no buffer space available
 20. Jan 26 Dieter                     Tyan 2865 (was: dual vs single core opteron 100's)


21. Jan 26 Brooks Davis Re: Tyan 2865 (was: dual vs single core opteron 100's) 22. Jan 26 O. Hartmann Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 23. Jan 27 conrads@cox.net 32-bit X libs? 24. Jan 27 Scott Long Re: 32-bit X libs? 25. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: 32-bit X libs? 26. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0 27. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0 28. Jan 27 Alexander Konovalenko Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 29. Jan 27 Mike Jakubik Re: the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0 30. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson fbsd-amd64 desktop 31. Jan 27 Bruce Becker amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 32. Jan 27 Bruce Becker amd64/92412: rcp.rstatd reports bogus packets/per/second info 33. Jan 27 Bruce Becker amd64/92413: jail won't shut down 34. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 35. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: amd64/92413: jail won't shut down 36. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: amd64/92412: rcp.rstatd reports bogus packets/per/second info 37. Jan 27 Danny Braniss Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 38. Jan 27 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: amd64/92413: jail won't shut down 39. Jan 27 Peter Jeremy Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 40. Jan 27 Adriaan de Groot Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop
41. Jan 27 James Seward Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 42. Jan 27 Antoine Pelisse Re: 32-bit X libs? 43. Jan 27 Lennart Sorth Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 44. Jan 27 Morten A. Middelthon CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 45. Jan 27 Joseph Koshy Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 46. Jan 27 Jon Kuster Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 47. Jan 27 Francois Tigeot Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 48. Jan 27 Jason Evans Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 49. Jan 27 Joseph Vella Is SMP included in i386? 50. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 51. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 52. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson Re: Is SMP included in i386? 53. Jan 27 hotlips Internet admin Re: amd64/92412: rcp.rstatd reports bogus packets/per/second info 54. Jan 27 hotlips Internet admin Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 55. Jan 27 hotlips Internet admin Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc (fwd) 56. Jan 27 Daniel Rock Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 57. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 58. Jan 27 Daniel Rock Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 59. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 60. Jan 27 <lars.tunkrans@bredband.ne Re: Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
61. Jan 27 Matthew D. Fuller Re: Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 62. Jan 27 hotlips Internet admin Re: amd64/92412: rcp.rstatd reports bogus packets/per/second info 63. Jan 27 Daniel Rock Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 64. Jan 27 Fernando Schapachnik Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 65. Jan 28 Andrew Pantyukhin Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 66. Jan 28 <lars.tunkrans@bredband.ne Re: Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 67. Jan 28 JoaoBR Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 68. Jan 28 O. Hartmann Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 69. Jan 28 Peter Jeremy Re: Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 70. Jan 28 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 71. Jan 28 Armin Mohirng amd64/92463: Buttons of USB mouse do no work under KDE 3.4.2 72. Jan 28 Mathieu Prevot Re: version 6.0 and AMD64 73. Jan 28 Ken Gunderson Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 74. Jan 28 JoaoBR Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date