2016/freebsd-net/20160131.freebsd-net
Messages: 86, old messages first
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:18:56 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 2. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 3. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 4. Jan 24 Adrian Chadd Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 5. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 6. Jan 24 Adrian Chadd Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 7. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 8. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 9. Jan 24 Adrian Chadd Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 10. Jan 24 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 11. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 12. Jan 24 Navdeep Parhar Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 13. Jan 24 Navdeep Parhar Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 14. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 15. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 16. Jan 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 17. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 18. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 19. Jan 24 Marcus Cenzatti Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 20. Jan 24 Ben Woods Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current
21. Jan 24 Gary Jennejohn Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 22. Jan 24 Andrey V. Elsukov Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 23. Jan 24 =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard= Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 24. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 25. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 26. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 27. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 28. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 29. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 30. Jan 24 Marko Zec Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 31. Jan 24 Ben Woods Re: Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 32. Jan 24 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention 33. Jan 25 Russell L. Carter ipfw NAT /etc/rc.firewall question 34. Jan 25 Phabricator [Differential] [Closed] D4972: hyperv/hn: Partly rework transmission path 35. Jan 25 Phabricator [Differential] [Closed] D4977: hyperv/hn: Use m_copydata for chimney sending. 36. Jan 25 Ian Smith Re: ipfw NAT /etc/rc.firewall question 37. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206567] [msk] msk0: watchdog timeout - 88E8053 on i386 38. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Missing Intel I219-V support in 10-STABLE and 11-CURRENT 39. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206494] lock order reversal (sleepable after non-sleepable) in in_mcast.c/bxe.c 40. Jan 25 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
41. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Missing Intel I219-V support in 10-STABLE and 11-CURRENT 42. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 193452] Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadcom) 43. Jan 25 Russell L. Carter Re: ipfw NAT /etc/rc.firewall question 44. Jan 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 203524] TCP checksum failed on igb network adapter 45. Jan 25 Xiaoye Sun swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 46. Jan 26 sepherosa_gmail.com (Sephe [Differential] [Request, 136 lines] D5074: hyperv/hn: Improve sending performance 47. Jan 26 Pavel Odintsov Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 48. Jan 26 Luigi Rizzo Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 49. Jan 26 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 50. Jan 26 Luigi Rizzo Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 51. Jan 26 Gary Jennejohn Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 52. Jan 26 Luigi Rizzo Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 53. Jan 26 Daniel Eischen Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 54. Jan 27 Gary Jennejohn Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 55. Jan 27 Luigi Rizzo Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 56. Jan 27 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 57. Jan 27 Kevin Oberman Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 58. Jan 27 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 59. Jan 27 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 60. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low
61. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Missing Intel I219-V support in 10-STABLE and 11-CURRENT 62. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Missing Intel I219-V support in 10-STABLE and 11-CURRENT 63. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206533] Intel I219-V in 11-CURRENT and 10-STABLE 64. Jan 27 Sean Bruno em/igb CFT 65. Jan 27 Michael McConville Undefined shift overflow in dhclient(8) 66. Jan 27 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 67. Jan 27 Alfred Perlstein Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 68. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 161277] [em] [patch] BMC cannot receive IPMI traffic after loading or enabling the if_em driver 69. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 199174] em tx and rx hang 70. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 195078] em tx_dma_fails and dropped packets 71. Jan 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 200221] em0 watchdog timeout under load 72. Jan 28 Daniel Eischen Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 73. Jan 28 sepherosa_gmail.com (Sephe [Differential] [Request, 217 lines] D5098: hyperv/hn: Reorganize TX csum offloading 74. Jan 28 sepherosa_gmail.com (Sephe [Differential] [Request, 5 lines] D5099: hyperv/hn: Enable IP header checksum offloading 75. Jan 28 Eric van Gyzen Intel I219-V Support? 76. Jan 28 Pieper, Jeffrey E RE: Intel I219-V Support? 77. Jan 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low 78. Jan 29 Kubilay Kocak Re: Intel I219-V Support? 79. Jan 29 Pieper, Jeffrey E RE: Intel I219-V Support? 80. Jan 29 Xiaoye Sun Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success
81. Jan 29 Luigi Rizzo Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 82. Jan 29 Xiaoye Sun Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 83. Jan 29 Xiaoye Sun Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 84. Jan 29 Luigi Rizzo Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success 85. Jan 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low 86. Jan 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 194485] Userland cannot add IPv6 prefix routes
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date