Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:02:41 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> To: "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEAD ip_fw2 ipsec b0rked Message-ID: <yge1xskfkta.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <001501c3a524$8bc40170$0235a8c0@raisa> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0311062137160.653@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <001501c3a524$8bc40170$0235a8c0@raisa>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:44:45 +0200
>>>>> "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi> said:
> 1) when someone fixes the
> panic: ipsec_gethist: obsolete API
> in netinet/ip_fw2.c
ari> I think that ipsec_gethist is being called from ip_input
ari> also, so if it is going to be obsolete the new way can
ari> be found there. Or do you mean that only
ari> then second parameter is now obsolete ?
Yes, ipsec_gethist() was obsoleted and replaced by ipsec_getnhist()
during KAME merge. Calling ipsec_gethist() in ip_input.c which you
mentioned was already replaced by ipsec_getnhist(). However, I didn't
noticed that ipsec_gethist() is called in ip_fw2.c.
ari> (Apparently someone is merging things from kame
ari> tree ?)
Yes, I did.
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yge1xskfkta.wl%ume>