Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:13:33 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> Cc: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best archiver? (for music) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903151011480.40993@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090315051114.GC28705@thought.org> References: <20090313191520.GA14233@thought.org> <20090313202226.GA47453@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903132128460.33043@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090314030558.GB25027@thought.org> <20090314072602.GA75036@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090315035101.GA28705@thought.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903150516360.38979@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090315051114.GC28705@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > That's the idea: take telephone/voice @ what? 4kbps? -- it was standard means between 300-3100Hz. often - sounds below 300Hz are now that filtered today. record your voice at 8Khz sampling rate and then compress with speex various options and compare compressed and uncompressed. as long as only speech is recorded, and not too high compression is selected, it tends to improve, not degrade quality esp. when recording is noisy.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903151011480.40993>