Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:52:52 +0000
From:      krad <kraduk@googlemail.com>
To:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc:        Peter Steele <psteele@maxiscale.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: How do I create large partitions in FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <d36406630912081252j304ad4b5tff5cb86e190f481a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091208210402.ad3ba281.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33D0D44A@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <20091208195424.850e8363.freebsd@edvax.de> <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33D0D498@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <20091208202749.d3f3b697.freebsd@edvax.de> <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33D0D4C3@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <20091208210402.ad3ba281.freebsd@edvax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/12/8 Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>

> On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:43:41 -0600, Peter Steele <psteele@maxiscale.com>
> wrote:
> > Yes, I know what a BSD slice is compared to a BSD partition.
> > Considering that fdisk uses "partition" interchangeably in
> > cases with "slice", I often do as well. I guess it can be
> > confusing if one isn't careful with context.
>
> You're right - fdisk uses different terminology.
>
>
>
> > We already have a configuration in place on our smaller 1U
> > boxes which are divided into three slices, one for the OS
> > (with 2 partitions), one for swap, and the third slice for
> > data. The third slice is divided into two partitions, one
> > UFS and one raw. The first two slices are gmirrored, the
> > third slice is not.
>
> Okay, now I understand. It's much more complex than it seemed
> from your initial statement. :-)
>
> What you want in the end is e. g.
>        /dev/da1s1a = /
>        /dev/da1s1d = /usr (or maybe /usr/local)
>        /dev/da1s2b = swap
>        /dev/da1s3d = /bigstorage (or something similar)
>        /dev/da1s3e = raw
>
>
>
> > For consistency we want to use the same slice configuration
> > for these large drives. We don't *have* to do it this way
> > but it simplifies things for our legacy code. We're not
> > using any gmirroring on these raid boxes of course, and we
> > only need one partition on the third slice (no raw partition)
> > but otherwise the layout will largely be the same.
>
> Then it looks to me that using gpt / gpart is the way to go...
>
>
>
> --
> Polytropon
> Magdeburg, Germany
> Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
> Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>

stay away from dangerously dedicated it seems as though they are being
phased out



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d36406630912081252j304ad4b5tff5cb86e190f481a>