Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:07:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stable production version. Message-ID: <1343221644538-5729739.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20120725194717.550d0603@AMD620.ovitrap.com> References: <BAY170-W1663C21603F489541F2C4F9AC30@phx.gbl> <500FD659.4090106@my.gd> <20120725194717.550d0603@AMD620.ovitrap.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
8.3 or 9.1. Using 9.0 when 9.1 is behind the corner is going backwards IMHO. or 9-STABLE if you want your system evolving up to release, which is nice because you can catch and solve all possible problems one at the time, and not be overwhelmed upgrading only to RELEASE. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Stable-production-version-tp5729696p5729739.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1343221644538-5729739.post>