Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:14:26 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: A very 'trivial' question about /root Message-ID: <44r4fmz5j1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <20130628153459.4519d5b7.freebsd@edvax.de> (Polytropon's message of "Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:34:59 %2B0200") References: <1372407002.6831.34.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <201306281325.r5SDPitf054224@fire.js.berklix.net> <20130628153459.4519d5b7.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> writes: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:25:44 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> ( I'd guess OpenBSD might go for a tighter /root though, as they're >> supposedly keen on security. ) > > Currently I've got no OpenBSD installation at hand to verify, > but I _assume_ they still have the same defaults as FreeBSD > regarding permissions of /root. That's correct.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44r4fmz5j1.fsf>