Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:42:33 GMT From: Mark <admin@asarian-host.net> To: "'Daniel Gerzo'" <danger@rulez.sk> Cc: 'Dan Nelson' <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions' <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Re[2]: ZendOptimizer and libm.so.2? Message-ID: <200610032242.k93MgWm7089806@asarian-host.net> In-Reply-To: <571316193.20061004002556@rulez.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Gerzo [mailto:danger@rulez.sk] > Sent: woensdag 4 oktober 2006 0:27 > To: Mark > Cc: 'Dan Nelson'; 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions' > Subject: Re[2]: ZendOptimizer and libm.so.2? > > > > Hello Mark, > > Wednesday, October 4, 2006, 12:22:28 AM, you wrote: > > >> > Which leads me to believe I'm correct in thinking Zend > >> > Optimizer really just needs libm.so.2, right? > >> > >> You're better off installing the misc/compat4x port to get > >> libm.so.2 . > > > No, I *have* libm.so.2 (FreeBSD 4.11); The port for Zend > > Optimizer > > You should be better with not having such an ancient system :-) I still happen to think 4.11 is the most stable FreeBSD ever made. :) I took the advice, though, but in reverse: I installed misc/compat5x (after a bit of tweaking). And now I have a bonafide libm.so.3, in /usr/local/lib/compat/libm.so.3. I'm probably not gonna win any beauty contests with it, but this libm.so.3 is the real deal, at least. - Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610032242.k93MgWm7089806>