Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:00:12 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: "Derrick Brashear" <shadow@gmail.com> Cc: Tony Jago <tony@convoitec.com>, Alec Kloss <alec@setfilepointer.com>, "<freebsd-afs@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-afs@freebsd.org>, "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> Subject: Re: OpenAFS port Message-ID: <48124915@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <db6e3f110812130750n405e4007p61db8b1d0cebbb99@mail.gmail.com> (Derrick Brashear's message of "Sat\, 13 Dec 2008 10\:50\:37 -0500") References: <493ACAC4.5020806@linuxbox.com> <20081213004251.GA88954@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <db6e3f110812121706i2b022e0bh3ff7413086c73dc1@mail.gmail.com> <A22DDF0293864B03AD8FE957D5EB5316@valentine> <42451957-717C-4CA3-97D9-E2ACABE55E34@pingpong.net> <60600083@bb.ipt.ru> <db6e3f110812130724p105ac704p4f3b03f21787d9d5@mail.gmail.com> <80286435@bb.ipt.ru> <db6e3f110812130737h1f142fey75b3ace0cc6c884c@mail.gmail.com> <14205895@bb.ipt.ru> <db6e3f110812130750n405e4007p61db8b1d0cebbb99@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Derrick Brashear" <shadow@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote: >> "Derrick Brashear" <shadow@gmail.com> writes: >> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote: >> >> "Derrick Brashear" <shadow@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > I don't believe there are conflicts between client objects, and server >> >> > objects. An independent client and server port should be possible. >> >> >> >> They both should install configuration files. Hence, they conflict >> >> here. >> > >> > Server and client use separate configuration, unless it's stuff *you >> added*, >> > and then it's a choice you made, OpenAFS itself doesn't have that issue. >> In >> > the old transarc-style universe, /usr/afs/etc versus /usr/vice/etc >> >> FreeBSD uses /usr/local/etc for all third-party configuration files, >> Both for servers and clients. So at least CellServDB and ThisCell >> should be dealed/installed by both. > > That's bad. Actually, it's horrible. It means you force a server to be in > the same AFS cell as a client, whereas it's valid and I have done a client > in one cell as a server in another. Is it a typical configuration? OK, let's find out what we can do here. Is it possible to configure a client/server software to use non-default values? Say, ETCBASE/openafs-client/* and ETCBASE/openafs-server/*? But next, what to do with krb.conf? Seems there is no possibility to use different kerberos configuration file for client and server. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48124915>