Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:52:30 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: When Is The Ports Tree Going To Be Updated? Message-ID: <50B3BA6E.7060303@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <loom.20121126T182635-720@post.gmane.org> References: <50B2A57A.3050500@tundraware.com> <50B2A8D8.90301@FreeBSD.org> <50B2AA07.8090103@tundraware.com> <201211251856.40381.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50B2BEE1.9030903@tundraware.com> <loom.20121126T120530-186@post.gmane.org> <05eafe033134e0771d54dec2d9388c8f@homey.local> <loom.20121126T161423-178@post.gmane.org> <C1998C36-57DF-4ACE-8AF2-09E1885E7176@my.gd> <loom.20121126T170433-746@post.gmane.org> <loom.20121126T182635-720@post.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/26/2012 11:37 AM, jb wrote: > jb <jb.1234abcd <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> >... >>>> > > ># portsnap fetch extract >>>> > > ># ls -al /usr/ports/IN* >>>> > > >-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26879597 Nov 26 15:37 /usr/ports/INDEX-7 >>>> > > >-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26763600 Nov 26 15:38 /usr/ports/INDEX-8 >>>> > > >-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26744834 Nov 26 15:38 /usr/ports/INDEX-9 >>>> > > >-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1654048 Nov 11 11:45 /usr/ports/INDEX-9.bz2 > One detail. > The size of /usr/ports/INDEX-9 is 26744834. > <SNIP> One wonders if using svn to keep the ports tree up-to-date might not be simpler, and perhaps, more reliable ... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B3BA6E.7060303>