Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:38:34 +1100 From: "Jan Mikkelsen" <janm@transactionware.com> To: <sos@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: ATA Controller choices Message-ID: <000001c1ba67$b66429e0$fc5807ca@mosm1> In-Reply-To: <200202201953.g1KJrKq77437@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
S=F8ren Schmidt wrote: > ... However the Serverworks ROSB4 chips is not one I=20 > would recommend using, if you need serious ATA support on=20 > such a board, install a Promise TX2 or later or a HPT370 or later ... I think I've also seen you post that the Highpoint is better than the Promise. What is the "quality heirarchy" of ATA chips? Eg. I know the VIA chips have issues. Where does the CMD 649 fit in that heirarchy? Such a list (or even a list of known issues with particular chips) would be useful for specifying new machines. Thanks, Jan Mikkelsen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001c1ba67$b66429e0$fc5807ca>