Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:06:02 +0900 (JST) From: Hideki Yamamoto <yamamoto436@oki.com> To: rizzo@icir.org Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW for IPv6 Message-ID: <20031219.080602.26517061.yamamoto436@oki.com> In-Reply-To: <20031218082605.A2252@xorpc.icir.org> References: <1071763256.543.10.camel@ptp.northnetworks.ca> <20031219.011213.27797873.yamamoto436@oki.com> <20031218082605.A2252@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Luigi, I am very happy to hear that you and your student are working on this matter. I hope you will release the beta or something as soon as possible. By the way, does it run on FreeBSD 5.1 base or 4.9? Regards, Hideki Yamamoto From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Subject: Re: IPFW for IPv6 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:26:05 -0800 Message-ID: <20031218082605.A2252@xorpc.icir.org> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:12:13AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am interested in ipfw for IPv6, especially on dummynet. > > Does someone have information on ipfw for IPv6? > > Two students of mine have a basically working version of > ipfw2 for ipv6 (with dummynet too). I need to review the code > before making patches available, though. > > In the detail, the layer2 version of the code (where ipv6 fields > are matched within ether_input()/ether_output(), are ok, > whereas the layer3 version (call from ip6input(), ip6output()) > need a bit more debugging when used with dummynet because suspending > and resuming computation within ip6output() is tricky for the > amount of state around -- that was time consuming in ipv4 as well. > > cheers > luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031219.080602.26517061.yamamoto436>