Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 01:35:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Ertl <le@FreeBSD.org> To: Craig Boston <craig@xfoil.gank.org> Cc: Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com> Subject: Re: PLEASE TEST: IPI deadlock avoidance patch Message-ID: <20040901013402.K557@korben.in.tern> In-Reply-To: <20040831211944.GA65532@nowhere> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAAciVbQl3RwkOpqJOt%2B0jebAEAAAAA@telia.com> <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAADquDJ%2Bmdi0ClwuYGqAhj4gEAAAAA@telia.com> <20040831211944.GA65532@nowhere>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Craig Boston wrote: > So it seems that gvinum RAID-5 is a key factor in the corruption, and > SMP greatly increases the odds of it happening... > > Is it worth creating a PR so this doesn't get lost amid the release > madness? PR isn't necessary, it's my number one task right now (which isn't easy, since the corruption isn't really repeatable at will). Gimme a little more time. thanks, le -- Lukas Ertl http://homepage.univie.ac.at/l.ertl/ le@FreeBSD.org http://people.freebsd.org/~le/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040901013402.K557>