Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:03:41 +0000
From:      RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sending mail with attachments always fail (FreeBSD/pf)
Message-ID:  <20091121170341.2c1bf3cb@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091121152720.GA3878@current.Sisis.de>
References:  <6c51dbb10911210659t2e7b87dcg66d71544312d4172@mail.gmail.com> <20091121152720.GA3878@current.Sisis.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:27:20 +0100
Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:

> El d=EDa Saturday, November 21, 2009 a las 08:59:12PM +0600, Victor
> Lyapunov escribi=F3:
>=20
> > Hi all,
> >=20
> > I have production network with FreeBSD box acting as firewall. The
> > problem emerge as soon as users send mail with attachments. (Sending
> > mail without attachments always succeeds). Basically, when a user
> > tries to send a message, only part of it transmitted before
> > connection is interrupted and sending fails. The problem persists
> > only when pf is enabled.
>=20
> I think concerning TCP/IP there is no diff between a mail with or w/o
> attachment, it is just talking SMTP to a remote server and only the
> size, i.e, the number of IP pkgs, differs; the content is anyway;

This kind of thing is often due to a mtu blackhole - when a larger
email causes a full size IP packet to be sent. I don't see why PF
should make a difference though, IFAIK it's supposed to let ICMP through
when it's learned state on a tcp connection.


> I never used S/SA as flags in my rules, only S.=20

S/SA is correct, it mean look at SYN and ACK and match if only SYN is
set, S matches on SYN irrespective of whether ACK is set.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091121170341.2c1bf3cb>