Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 22:35:28 -0500 From: Brian Kee <brianakee@gmail.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Passing Options to Dependancies During make Message-ID: <34bd75410509082035efd911a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050909030517.GA2674@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <34bd754105090818362f318091@mail.gmail.com> <20050909030517.GA2674@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you for the information. I do see how this woudl be problematic.=20 Is there an official FAQ for this list? Where can it be located? Thank You,=20 Brian A. Kee On 9/8/05, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:=20 >=20 >=20 > This is a FAQ. The real answer is that even if you could do this, it > wouldn't work if the user already had PORTB installed, and what you > should do is make a slave port of PORTB that turns on the option by > default and CONFLICTS with the main PORTB, so it will at least fail > gracefully in this case. >=20 > Kris >=20 >=20 >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34bd75410509082035efd911a>