Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:33:00 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Edwards <peadar.edwards@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4 Message-ID: <4234410C.5080804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <34cb7c84050310091243cdc342@mail.gmail.com> References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr> <20050305151903.GC26240@hub.freebsd.org> <87mzth18e2.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <1DE178D508C1D70D1B5F9E87@cc-171.int.t-online.fr> <874qfpupk5.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <DDE9BD25F957493B50EE49C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr> <423027B1.8080503@FreeBSD.org> <34cb7c84050310091243cdc342@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Edwards wrote: > If someone experiencing these issues could try rebuilding after changing > > #define NNULLNODECACHE 16 > to > #define NNULLNODECACHE 1024 > > in null_subr.c (line 50 in my version, 1.45) > > And just see if it makes much of a difference. If so, it might be It does not help. The problem with nullfs only in jail environment. I've made a simple test: build devel/gettext port. Here is results: just ffs: 1:47 min nullfs: 1:43 min (oops!:) nullfs in jail: 12:12 min Almost ten times degradation. -- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4234410C.5080804>