Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:44:36 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade to 10.3 from 10.1 Message-ID: <44k2k3hfrv.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <570C2819.7070900@FreeBSD.org> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2016 23:41:29 %2B0100") References: <1460399864.2173.11.camel@inhio.eu> <570C2819.7070900@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On 11/04/2016 19:37, asv wrote: >> I don't feel confident to proceed with >> >> # freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.3-RELEASE >> >> from my 10.1-RELEASE-p31. >> I read on the FreeBSD website: "Systems running 9.3-RELEASE,10.3-RC[12] >> can upgrade as follows" but usually releases in the middle are >> included. >> I've tried to search a bit about it but I didn't find much. >> >> Am I just paranoid for not seeing 10.1 and 10.2 in the list? >> Did anybody try this operation already? >> I also have jails there, I want to be very prudent on this machine. > > Other release versions usually aren't listed explicitly, unless there is > something special that needs to be done to upgrade them. The fact that > 10.1 and 10.2 aren't listed is a sign that there's not going to be any > great difficulty upgrading from those versions. > > We haven't seen any horror stories about upgrades on the lists since > 10.3-RELEASE came out. That silence is what should give you confidence: > people just don't talk about things that work routinely. The minute > there's a problem though... I'm thinking there's a problem with setting refentrytitle, as at https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/installation.html#upgrade-binary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44k2k3hfrv.fsf>