Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:23:51 +0000 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <almarrie@gmail.com> To: "Andreas Davour" <ante@update.uu.se> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox Message-ID: <499c70c0701280923g95f6887o8fbc13da062470a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701281025370.2792@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> References: <45B907F1.5060402@locolomo.org> <200701271543.58654.tijl@ulyssis.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701272112190.9048@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <200701280052.26041.tijl@ulyssis.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701281025370.2792@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/28/07, Andreas Davour <ante@update.uu.se> wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > >> I followed those instructions and with firefox-2.0.0.1_1,1 it gives this > >> result: > >> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/pluginwrapper/flash7.so: Undefined > >> symbol "_dlsym" > >> > >> Since I'm now using 6.2-PRERELEASE I guess it could be fixed in the > >> final RELEASE, but it would be nice to know if someone can recognize > >> "_dlsym" and say it is so. > > > > You need to apply the rtld patch mentioned in the first link above. > > And I thought that I read that carefully! Was that paragraph added since > I read the document? ;) > > Anyway. Can we hope that patch is finding it's way into the main branch > with haste? FreeBSD without Flash working is not a suitable day-to-day > websurfing system. > > /andreas > > -- > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? How about it now? http://www.freshports.org/www/linuxpluginwrapper/ -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499c70c0701280923g95f6887o8fbc13da062470a>