Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:45:06 -0500 From: Ryan Coleman <editor@d3photography.com> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: christopher-ml@telting.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: Port dependencies Message-ID: <9BFF22F1-7559-4107-B149-94A79CA3ADB7@d3photography.com> In-Reply-To: <4d97ba5a.199K2FcyLXA6%2Bb5f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4D96668C.3090406@telting.org> <BANLkTinUz6DOMYhR7MHHtbMsK0UBNCwwBw@mail.gmail.com> <4d97ba5a.199K2FcyLXA6%2Bb5f%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 2, 2011, at 7:07 PM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2 April 2011 00:58, Chris Telting <christopher-ml@telting.org> wrote: >>> One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell. >> >> I think you've misunderstood the term dependency hell [1]. Anyone >> who has spent hours struggling with rpm ... would never dare to >> even think of such terms when using the Ports Collection. > > Dependency purgatory? Dantency Inferno. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9BFF22F1-7559-4107-B149-94A79CA3ADB7>