Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 19:44:12 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@freebsd.org>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11? Message-ID: <b19ea296-9f33-eb7c-4a18-e55c72422652@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --dDQ7C5dOGSF2WwJi8k0cv6HuqHviJhoA7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="HCtWPnVge54Jp3DB4cPRMoP2iW3wcAx2K" From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@freebsd.org>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Message-ID: <b19ea296-9f33-eb7c-4a18-e55c72422652@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11? References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> --HCtWPnVge54Jp3DB4cPRMoP2iW3wcAx2K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02.08.2016 09:47, Julian Elischer wrote: I don't have rights to commit my changes, and looks like I can not persuade others that my changes are Ok as-is, with all changes, made on requests from reviewers. Personally, I think, that (1) + (2) is orthogonal to (3) and it should be different change sets, reviews, etc. And, yes, (3) is great feature by itself. > Do we have any movement on these improvements? > even similar functionality by different names is ok. >=20 > 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- most= > important for me. (store-state)? > 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it <---- less important= > for me. > 3/ multiple state tables? this was discussed and I thought I saw patche= s > but I haven't seen it going in, <-- super luxurious --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --HCtWPnVge54Jp3DB4cPRMoP2iW3wcAx2K-- --dDQ7C5dOGSF2WwJi8k0cv6HuqHviJhoA7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXoh9hXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGOTZEMUNBMEI1RjQzMThCNjc0QjMzMEFF QUIwM0M1OEJGREM0NzhGAAoJEOqwPFi/3EeP134QAKfx53Oq4a4qMVHaENAf0Q6H VfNbQEMAki4D8jgOjS4DXqnuqBWiwyPUi+5Q8Qgz/ukVhT64Zbz303g3dHhp8ejS vTX0E9q9X5a5HTdWA1L+IgITycI6uszJx+84lO6cGe6IgzwSTHygMpahLk2tPuzr tk8suynUuv7bEIZ7cpK94q0+41QZNnSD9gmbIjACuiYnZcSqYqUePYFqTtx8xQUU 0hFmvO+DAJWxXVO7FVJRgHySzjUroUVxMXNANqSwIESU0bqoqX+bkD4pa19MKxmv gsc7pZ2ENpKsXF0bh4GveDKZ/pBezP4NzHBCJ3HZ4CAnP8DXXCQUP84Zl/row7pc fmOhxdEfymlpnRpGxVJJnSsxQ3NHV3ZQoqtIL/+VlUeXRW9KN05F1/geRtPsWHON Aov8zK6KRyQtFSenqwfWHwrqcAr2hBgePyx+xbIOu93fvd12O+L2PRJjo54659Lt o1RmUI7qg5Ufi8qzpRb/Y1VpjNDJ6a8LgYzU2TcDCHg9vEGmu2f6ygqt6MRoCJuE nUR/iWDF89y8p0dmIDfB9ABPxKiTa2SBMW4zBy7lE7puZcvL7zN9i5tAepXsOojh jvKczxU8WMsbHVMATRDTRUaus8EC3AYOwIi38XYk68DL5vVGrnzOXh1gpDjCcO/g L9oAu0TBnUk4px9cCqoW =ZcPb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDQ7C5dOGSF2WwJi8k0cv6HuqHviJhoA7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b19ea296-9f33-eb7c-4a18-e55c72422652>