Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:06:45 -0500 From: "Derrick Brashear" <shadow@gmail.com> To: rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com Cc: Alec Kloss <alec@setfilepointer.com>, freebsd-afs@freebsd.org, "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> Subject: Re: OpenAFS on FreeBSD Progress (Works) Message-ID: <db6e3f110812121706i2b022e0bh3ff7413086c73dc1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081213004251.GA88954@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <493ACAC4.5020806@linuxbox.com> <12501719@bb.ipt.ru> <493D898C.1030609@linuxbox.com> <22B6C509EF7C4AB0A2D8350C31BB8D5D@valentine> <57098597@bb.ipt.ru> <26695644@bb.ipt.ru> <DC87E29101195307B372C4F5@c-3157e155.1521-1-64736c12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se> <20081213004251.GA88954@keira.kiwi-computer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Rick C. Petty < rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:34:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > > > >Replying to myself. Seems I found out why this port may be needed: > > >Both server and client have common files (i.e. should be marked > > >as have CONFLICTS and can't be installed with each other). > > > > You don't need a meta port, you a client and a server port, and let the > > client install all common files, and let the server depend on the client, > > which is reasonable anyway. > > I think you have that backwards. The client contains a kernel module. The > server is all run in userland. I think in this case, have the client > depend > upon the server and have the server install all common files. I agree that > there should not be a metaport. > > The server similarly does not depend on the client. You don't need the kernel module to run the server. -- Derrick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?db6e3f110812121706i2b022e0bh3ff7413086c73dc1>