Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

2008/freebsd-stable/20080608.freebsd-stable

Messages: 241, sorted by Subject.
Last update: Sun Jun 8 3:50:31 2008

Up | Home | Archive Sorted by: Subject | Author | Date | Reverse Date
  1. Jun  6 Gavin Spomer        6.2-STABLE => 7.0-STABLE Upgrade root partition more
  2. Jun  6 Clifton Royston      Re: 6.2-STABLE => 7.0-STABLE Upgrade root partition 
  3. Jun  6 Skip Ford            Re: 6.2-STABLE => 7.0-STABLE Upgrade root partition 
  4. Jun  6 Royce Williams      6.3 stability and freebsd-update (was: Re: challenge
  5. Jun  6 Brooks Davis         Re: 6.3 stability and freebsd-update (was: Re: chall
  6. Jun  1 Clint Olsen         6.X potentially has messed up sk0
  7. Jun  4 Roland Smith        7-STABLE and Intel G33
  8. Jun  6 Arno J. Klaassen    [nvidia | shared irq] umass disconnects [was: panic 
  9. Jun  3 FreeBSD Tinderbox   [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
 10. Jun  3 FreeBSD Tinderbox   [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
 11. Jun  3 Doug Barton          Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
 12. Jun  3 Doug Barton          Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
 13. Jun  3 FreeBSD Tinderbox   [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98
 14. Jun  3 FreeBSD Tinderbox   [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
 15. Jun  5 Boris Samorodov     [solved] Re: 7-STABLE: bridge and em
 16. Jun  3 CZUCZY Gergely      ALTQ and cpufreq(4)
 17. Jun  4 Jo Rhett            challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with bug
 18. Jun  4 Doug Barton          Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with
 19. Jun  4 Kris Kennaway        Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with
 20. Jun  4 Scott Long           Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with


21. Jun 4 Stephen Clark Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 22. Jun 4 Kris Kennaway Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 23. Jun 4 Clifton Royston Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 24. Jun 4 Kevin Kinsey Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 25. Jun 4 Greg Byshenk Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 26. Jun 4 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 27. Jun 4 Clifton Royston Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 28. Jun 4 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 29. Jun 4 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 30. Jun 4 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 31. Jun 5 Kris Kennaway Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 32. Jun 5 Edwin Groothuis Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 33. Jun 5 Scott Long Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 34. Jun 5 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 35. Jun 5 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 36. Jun 5 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 37. Jun 5 Steven Hartland Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 38. Jun 5 Steven Hartland Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 39. Jun 5 Edwin Groothuis Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 40. Jun 5 Scott Long Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with
41. Jun 5 Max Laier Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 42. Jun 5 Adrian Chadd Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 43. Jun 5 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 44. Jun 5 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 45. Jun 5 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 46. Jun 5 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 47. Jun 5 Torfinn Ingolfsen Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 48. Jun 5 Peter Jeremy Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 49. Jun 5 Steven Hartland Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 50. Jun 5 Daniel O'Connor Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 51. Jun 5 Adrian Chadd Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 52. Jun 5 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erlin Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 53. Jun 5 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erlin Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 54. Jun 5 Chris Marlatt Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 55. Jun 5 Kris Kennaway Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 56. Jun 5 Chris Marlatt Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 57. Jun 5 John Baldwin Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 58. Jun 5 Kris Kennaway Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 59. Jun 5 Adrian Chadd Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 60. Jun 5 Chris Marlatt Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with
61. Jun 5 Chris Marlatt Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 62. Jun 5 Adrian Chadd Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 63. Jun 5 Adrian Chadd Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 64. Jun 5 Kris Kennaway Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 65. Jun 5 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 66. Jun 5 Patrick M. Hausen Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 67. Jun 5 Chris Marlatt Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 68. Jun 5 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 69. Jun 5 Chris Marlatt Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 70. Jun 5 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 71. Jun 5 Ivan Voras Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 72. Jun 5 Ken Smith Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 73. Jun 5 Chris Marlatt Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 74. Jun 5 Tom Evans Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 75. Jun 5 Pieter de Goeje Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 76. Jun 5 Doug Barton Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 77. Jun 5 Steven Hartland Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 78. Jun 5 Doug Barton Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 79. Jun 5 Chris Rees Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 80. Jun 5 Chris Marlatt Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with
81. Jun 5 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erlin Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 82. Jun 5 John Baldwin Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 83. Jun 5 Mark Linimon Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 84. Jun 5 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 85. Jun 5 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 86. Jun 5 Mark Linimon Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 87. Jun 5 Kris Kennaway Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 88. Jun 5 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 89. Jun 5 Peter Jeremy Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 90. Jun 5 Miroslav Lachman Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 91. Jun 5 Scott Long Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 92. Jun 5 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 93. Jun 5 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 94. Jun 6 Mike Edenfield Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 95. Jun 6 Manfred Usselmann Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 96. Jun 6 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erlin Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 97. Jun 6 Vivek Khera Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 98. Jun 6 Vivek Khera Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 99. Jun 6 Vivek Khera Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 100. Jun 6 Clifton Royston Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with
101. Jun 6 Michael Gratton Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 102. Jun 7 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 103. Jun 7 Paul Schmehl Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 104. Jun 7 Adrian Chadd Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 105. Jun 7 Kostik Belousov Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 106. Jun 7 Ken Smith Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 107. Jun 7 Andrew Reilly Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 108. Jun 7 Mike Edenfield Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 109. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 110. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 111. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 112. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 113. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 114. Jun 7 sthaug@nethelp.no Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 115. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 116. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 117. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 118. Jun 7 Patrick M. Hausen Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 119. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 120. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with
121. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 122. Jun 7 Doug Barton Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 123. Jun 7 Max Laier Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 124. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 125. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 126. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 127. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 128. Jun 7 Doug Barton Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 129. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 130. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 131. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 132. Jun 7 Mike Edenfield Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 133. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 134. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 135. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 136. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 137. Jun 7 Dick Hoogendijk Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 138. Jun 7 Garance A Drosehn Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 139. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 140. Jun 7 Garance A Drosehn Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with
141. Jun 7 Oliver Fromme Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 142. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 143. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 144. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 145. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 146. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 147. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 148. Jun 7 Garance A Drosehn Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 149. Jun 7 Steven Hartland Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 150. Jun 7 Ken Smith Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 151. Jun 7 Garance A Drosehn Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with 152. Jun 5 Jo Rhett CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premat 153. Jun 5 Bruce M. Simpson Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr 154. Jun 5 Jeremy Chadwick Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr 155. Jun 5 Patrick M. Hausen Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr 156. Jun 5 Torfinn Ingolfsen Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr 157. Jun 5 Doug Barton Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr 158. Jun 5 Torfinn Ingolfsen Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr 159. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr 160. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr
161. Jun 7 Dick Hoogendijk Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr 162. Jun 7 Jo Rhett Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is pr 163. Jun 7 Jo Rhett console access 164. Jun 4 Evren Yurtesen Re: cpufreq broken on core2duo 165. Jun 4 Evren Yurtesen Re: cpufreq broken on core2duo 166. Jun 5 John Baldwin Re: cpufreq broken on core2duo 167. Jun 7 Evren Yurtesen Re: cpufreq broken on core2duo 168. Jun 7 Jeremy Chadwick Re: cpufreq broken on core2duo 169. Jun 7 Evren Yurtesen Re: cpufreq broken on core2duo 170. Jun 4 Andrew Snow cpufreq broken on core2duo (was: powerd is doing not 171. Jun 4 Roland Smith Re: cpufreq broken on core2duo (was: powerd is doing 172. Jun 5 John Baldwin Re: cpufreq broken on core2duo (was: powerd is doing 173. Jun 7 Arno J. Klaassen cpufreq for Opteron quad-core (2354) 174. Jun 4 Alexander Motin Crashes in devfs. Possibly on interface creation/des 175. Jun 5 Oleksandr Tymoshenk Re: Crashes in devfs. Possibly on interface creation 176. Jun 5 Kostik Belousov Re: Crashes in devfs. Possibly on interface creation 177. Jun 7 Andy Kosela Current status of support for high end SAN hardware 178. Jun 7 Daniel Ponticello Re: Current status of support for high end SAN hardw 179. Jun 3 FreeBSD Security Of FreeBSD supported branches update 180. Jun 6 Miroslav Lachman Re: freebsd-update 6.2-R -> 6.3-B1 rollback failed
181. Jun 5 Pete French gmirror patches 182. Jun 5 Miroslav Lachman Re: gmirror patches 183. Jun 6 Miroslav Lachman Re: gmirror patches 184. Jun 6 Terry Sposato Re: gmirror patches 185. Jun 6 Pete French Re: gmirror patches 186. Jun 6 Miroslav Lachman Re: gmirror patches 187. Jun 6 Volker Theile Re: Instant reboot with FreeBSD 6.3 and > 2GB RAM 188. Jun 3 Peter Jeremy Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4) 189. Jun 3 John Baldwin Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4) 190. Jun 3 John Baldwin Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4) 191. Jun 3 Peter Jeremy Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4) 192. Jun 4 John Baldwin Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4) 193. Jun 5 Alfred Perlstein Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4) 194. Jun 5 John Baldwin Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4) 195. Jun 5 Alfred Perlstein Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4) 196. Jun 6 Stefan Lambrev Java binaries for FreeBSD 7 197. Jun 6 Pollywog Re: Java binaries for FreeBSD 7 198. Jun 7 Deb Goodkin Java Status 199. Jun 7 Daniel Ponticello kernel panic on em0/taskq 200. Jun 3 Michael C Voorhis Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD?
201. Jun 3 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 202. Jun 3 Steven Schlansker Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 203. Jun 3 Subhro Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 204. Jun 3 Pawel Jakub Dawidek Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 205. Jun 3 Martin Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 206. Jun 3 Martin Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 207. Jun 4 nlaroche@vt.edu Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 208. Jun 4 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 209. Jun 4 nlaroche@vt.edu Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 210. Jun 4 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 211. Jun 4 Josh Paetzel Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 212. Jun 4 Richard Arends Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 213. Jun 4 Doug Barton Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 214. Jun 4 Alexandre \"Sunny\" Re: Lenovo Thinkpad t61p and FreeBSD? 215. Jun 6 Ganbold Re: MFC of em/igb drivers 216. Jun 6 Jeremy Chadwick Re: MFC of em/igb drivers 217. Jun 6 Ganbold Re: MFC of em/igb drivers 218. Jun 6 Jeremy Chadwick Re: MFC of em/igb drivers 219. Jun 6 sthaug@nethelp.no Re: MFC of em/igb drivers 220. Jun 4 Andriy Gapon mystery: lock up after fs dump
221. Jun 4 Kostik Belousov Re: mystery: lock up after fs dump 222. Jun 4 Andriy Gapon Re: mystery: lock up after fs dump 223. Jun 4 Jeremy Chadwick Re: mystery: lock up after fs dump 224. Jun 4 Kostik Belousov Re: mystery: lock up after fs dump 225. Jun 5 Andriy Gapon Re: mystery: lock up after fs dump 226. Jun 7 Jo Rhett please stop being nasty to people. 227. Jun 7 Eric Masson Re: please stop being nasty to people. 228. Jun 4 Evren Yurtesen powerd is doing nothing? 229. Jun 4 Andrew Snow Re: powerd is doing nothing? 230. Jun 4 Evren Yurtesen Re: powerd is doing nothing? 231. Jun 7 David Buxton Re: SCSI bus reset with Adaptec 29320ALP and Eonstor 232. Jun 1 Dr Josef Karthauser RE: Status of ZFS in -stable? 233. Jun 3 Eugene Grosbein Support for Nokia USB modems 234. Jun 6 Lin Jui-Nan Eric TMPFS: File System is Full 235. Jun 7 Lin Jui-Nan Eric TMPFS: File System is Full 236. Jun 4 Ken Smith Upcoming release schedule 237. Jun 4 Carlos A. M. dos Sa Re: Why does sysinstall still limits cylinders to 65 238. Jun 4 Doug Barton Re: Why does sysinstall still limits cylinders to 65 239. Jun 4 John Baldwin Re: Why does sysinstall still limits cylinders to 65 240. Jun 1 JoaoBR zfs start failure when /usr is on zfs (and rcorder c
241. Jun 1 JoaoBR Re: zfs start failure when /usr is on zfs (and rcord


Up | Home | Archive Sorted by: Subject | Author | Date | Reverse Date
Contact us
Last update: Sun Jun 8 3:50:31 2008
Created by mailindex 1.1
Copyright © 1995-2015 FreeBSD Project.
All rights reserved.