Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

2014/freebsd-ruby/20141123.freebsd-ruby

Messages: 15, sorted by Subject.
Last update: Sun Nov 23 3:50:35 2014

Up | Home | Archive Sorted by: Subject | Author | Date | Reverse Date
  1. Nov 16 bugzilla-noreply@fr [Bug 194673] [new port] sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_
  2. Nov 16 bugzilla-noreply@fr  [Bug 194673] [new port] sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_
  3. Nov 22 bugzilla-noreply@fr [Bug 195268] [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build f
  4. Nov 22 bugzilla-noreply@fr  [Bug 195268] [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build f
  5. Nov 22 bugzilla-noreply@fr [Bug 195268] New: [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix bu
  6. Nov 21 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently 
  7. Nov 21 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently 
  8. Nov 17 portscout@FreeBSD.o FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
  9. Nov 18 portscout@FreeBSD.o  FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
 10. Nov 19 portscout@FreeBSD.o  FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
 11. Nov 21 portscout@FreeBSD.o  FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
 12. Nov 22 portscout@FreeBSD.o  FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
 13. Nov 22 bugzilla-noreply@fr maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 195268] [patch] 
 14. Nov 18 Matthew Closson     What determines whether a rubygem should be ported o
 15. Nov 19 Steve Wills          Re: What determines whether a rubygem should be port


Up | Home | Archive Sorted by: Subject | Author | Date | Reverse Date
Contact us
Last update: Sun Nov 23 3:50:35 2014
Created by mailindex 1.1
Copyright © 1995-2015 FreeBSD Project.
All rights reserved.