Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

2017/freebsd-ports/20170625.freebsd-ports

Messages: 126, sorted by Subject.
Last update: Sun Jun 25 3:50:08 2017

Up | Home | Archive Sorted by: Subject | Author | Date | Reverse Date
  1. Jun 18 Steve Kargl         [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision
  2. Jun 18 Steve Kargl          Re: [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision
  3. Jun 20 Kubilay Kocak        Re: [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision
  4. Jun 20 Steve Kargl          Re: [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision
  5. Jun 22 David Demelier      [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS v
  6. Jun 22 Baptiste Daroussin   Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
  7. Jun 22 =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_  Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
  8. Jun 22 Baptiste Daroussin   Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
  9. Jun 22 Vlad K.              Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 10. Jun 22 David Demelier       Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 11. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.n  Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 12. Jun 22 Baptiste Daroussin   Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 13. Jun 22 David Demelier       Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 14. Jun 22 Matthew Seaman       Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 15. Jun 22 Baho Utot            Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 16. Jun 22 Torsten Zuehlsdorff  Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 17. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.n  Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 18. Jun 22 Julian Elischer      Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 19. Jun 22 Baho Utot            Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 
 20. Jun 22 Torsten Zuehlsdorff  Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 


21. Jun 22 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 22. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.n Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 23. Jun 22 Matthew Seaman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 24. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.n Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 25. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.n Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 26. Jun 22 Dave Hayes Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 27. Jun 22 Dave Hayes Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 28. Jun 22 demelier.david@gmai Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 29. Jun 22 Dave Hayes Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 30. Jun 22 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 31. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.n Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 32. Jun 22 Miroslav Lachman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 33. Jun 22 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 34. Jun 22 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 35. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 36. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 37. Jun 23 Kurt Jaeger Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 38. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 39. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 40. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by
41. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 42. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 43. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 44. Jun 23 Kurt Jaeger Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 45. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 46. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 47. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 48. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmai Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 49. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmai Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 50. Jun 23 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 51. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmai Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 52. Jun 23 Guido Falsi Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 53. Jun 23 Matthew Seaman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 54. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmai Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 55. Jun 23 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 56. Jun 23 RW Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 57. Jun 23 <scratch65535@att.n Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 58. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 59. Jun 23 Matt Smith Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 60. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by
61. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 62. Jun 23 Guido Falsi Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 63. Jun 23 Guido Falsi Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 64. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 65. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 66. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 67. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 68. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 69. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 70. Jun 23 Michelle Sullivan Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 71. Jun 23 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 72. Jun 23 Michelle Sullivan Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 73. Jun 24 =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Wa Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 74. Jun 24 Thomas Mueller Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 75. Jun 24 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by 76. Jun 23 abi [SAMBA] and file content caching 77. Jun 19 The Doctor Apache 2.4.26 78. Jun 24 Carmel NY clamav-unofficial-sigs 79. Jun 19 Xavi Garcia databases/mariadb101-client broken in the quarterly 80. Jun 19 Xavi Garcia Re: databases/mariadb101-client broken in the quarte
81. Jun 24 Bob Eager Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow 82. Jun 24 Steven Hartland Re: Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow 83. Jun 24 Bob Eager Re: Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow 84. Jun 19 Jeff Sickel FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3 85. Jun 19 wen heping Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3 86. Jun 19 DutchDaemon - FreeB Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3 87. Jun 22 portscout@FreeBSD.o FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date 88. Jun 24 Bruno Haible GNU libffcall 1.13 is released 89. Jun 24 Jov Re: GNU libffcall 1.13 is released 90. Jun 19 Global Test Market How much Is Your Opinion Worth? 91. Jun 18 Ben Lavery-Griffith Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 92. Jun 18 Ultima Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 93. Jun 18 Ultima Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 94. Jun 19 Ben Lavery-Griffith Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 95. Jun 19 Jaap Akkerhuis Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 96. Jun 19 Matt Smith Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 97. Jun 20 Jov Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 98. Jun 21 Andrea Venturoli net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 99. Jun 21 Ryan Frederick Re: net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 100. Jun 21 Ryan Frederick Re: net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails
101. Jun 22 Andrea Venturoli Re: net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 102. Jun 22 The Doctor NEW APR/APR-Utils 103. Jun 22 Andre Goree Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 104. Jun 23 Dewayne Geraghty Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 105. Jun 23 The Doctor Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 106. Jun 23 Dewayne Geraghty Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 107. Jun 23 The Doctor Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 108. Jun 20 Jeffrey Bouquet perl problem 109. Jun 19 Thomas Mueller pkg convert? 110. Jun 19 Matthew Seaman Re: pkg convert? 111. Jun 20 Thomas Mueller Re: pkg convert? 112. Jun 21 Yuri Please commit the new port science/py-pymol: OpenGL 113. Jun 23 Yasuhiro KIMURA PR commit request 114. Jun 22 =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_ PR needs care 115. Jun 19 Borodin Oleg Re: Questions about order of adding application to f 116. Jun 19 Kurt Jaeger Re: Questions about order of adding application to f 117. Jun 24 Peter Jeremy security/libressl not API-compatible with OpenSSL, b 118. Jun 24 Adam Weinberger Re: security/libressl not API-compatible with OpenSS 119. Jun 24 Walter Schwarzenfel Re: security/libressl not API-compatible with OpenSS 120. Jun 22 Rastko P Thunderbird + Lightning on FreeBSD
121. Jun 21 Carmel NY Update Postfix-current port. 122. Jun 21 Kurt Jaeger Re: Update Postfix-current port. 123. Jun 21 Kurt Jaeger Re: Update Postfix-current port. 124. Jun 23 George Mitchell www/libxul 125. Jun 23 Jan Beich Re: www/libxul 126. Jun 23 George Mitchell Re: www/libxul


Up | Home | Archive Sorted by: Subject | Author | Date | Reverse Date
Contact us
Last update: Sun Jun 25 3:50:08 2017
Created by mailindex 1.1
Copyright © 1995-2017 FreeBSD Project.
All rights reserved.