Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:46:12 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Dieter <freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/127640: GCC will not build shared libraries with -fprofile-generate on amd64 Message-ID: <20081005064612.GA29867@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <200810042226.WAA04290@sopwith.solgatos.com> References: <20080926171018.GX47828@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <200810042226.WAA04290@sopwith.solgatos.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 03:26:04PM +0100, Dieter wrote: > Having ports not build isn't acceptable. AMD64 isn't some rare and exotic > architecture. [...] Does "tinderbox" build ports? Finding the problems > as they are created should help a lot. There is already a tremendous amount of QA work being done, every day, to improve the ports collection. To get some idea, see the latter part of http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/qa.html; http://pointyhat.freebsd.org and the pages it leads to; the summary page on http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsoverall.py, and all of its other reports (e.g.:, http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsconcordanceforbuildenv.py?buildenv=amd64&buildenv2=i386, which is highly over-inflated right now due to a run of "try to build things on amd64 that are marked not-for-amd64 anyways); and various email sent from Ion-Mihai Tetcu on a daily basis as he does incremental builds (the former builds are bulk builds). mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081005064612.GA29867>