Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:50:03 GMT
From:      Nick Leuta <skynick@mail.sc.ru>
To:        freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: kern/143543: [pf] [panic] PF route-to causes kernel panic
Message-ID:  <201003140050.o2E0o3kF088361@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/143543; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nick Leuta <skynick@mail.sc.ru>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, slava@aprec.ru
Cc:  
Subject: Re: kern/143543: [pf] [panic] PF route-to causes kernel panic
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:34:50 +0300

 I have the similar problem but in a bit different situation...
 
 the rule is:
   pass out quick route-to (vlan2 192.168.0.1) from 192.168.0.2 to any
 where 192.168.0.2 is binded to the vlan2 interface. The default gateway 
 is 192.168.1.1 and is accessible through another interface.
 
 The "ping -S 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.1" command is used for test purposes, 
 and (sic!) the 192.168.0.1 is unreachable (really down...).
 
 Without that rule we have:
 
 PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) from 192.168.0.2: 56 data bytes
 <some timeout there>
 ping: sendto: Host is down
 <this message is repeated until Ctrl-C is pressed>
 
 With the rule we obtain the kernel panic (in "ping" process) instead of 
 the "ping: sendto: Host is down" message after the same timeout as in 
 the case without rule.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201003140050.o2E0o3kF088361>