Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 May 2013 01:21:49 -0400
From:      Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net>
To:        Florian Smeets <flo@smeets.im>
Cc:        "freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: IGMP with no matching rules
Message-ID:  <AEF3B928-3AE9-411C-ABA5-EB63FC15036E@DataIX.net>
In-Reply-To: <518510B6.8000309@smeets.im>
References:  <86C973B6-D12D-41AA-A1F9-D93E1C60856F@DataIX.net> <518510B6.8000309@smeets.im>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wow I can't believe I skipped over that option.

pass quick proto igmp allow-opts

Did it perfectly!!!!

Thank you Florian

-- 
 Jason Hellenthal
 JJH48-ARIN
 -(2^(N-1))


On May 4, 2013, at 9:44, Florian Smeets <flo@smeets.im> wrote:

> On 04.05.13 09:36, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>> Hey Everyone,
>> 
>> Has anyone seen IGMP traffic hit there pflog interface even if there
>> are no rules matching that tell it to log ?
>> 
>> Anyone that has a pointer to eliminate the logging of the IGMP
>> traffic would be extremely helpful. This has been fairly frustrating
>> up to this point trying to either create a rule to catch it that does
>> not specify logging or eliminate rules that shouldn't be matching but
>> do.
> 
> It would be easier to tell with your rule set, but I think this may be
> related to IP options, look for allow-opts in pf.conf(5).
> 
> Florian
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AEF3B928-3AE9-411C-ABA5-EB63FC15036E>