Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Oct 1996 12:28:26 +0300 (EET DST)
From:      Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   FreeBSD-stable new release
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.961017120657.17620D-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

=09HI!

For all those who do not read -hackers - there is another users vs.=20
developers flamewar, on part of it being the new releases, among others=20
the release of 2.1.6/7 - the number doesn't matter, it is the same=20
thing. Now are there any *sane* ideas as for what *new* things should=20
make it to 2.1.6? Are the new ports that can be brought over to be=20
bgrought over, do we want tcl-7.5 included in the system as there is in=20
-current, do we want some other "upgrades" be present (I personaly use=20
DES code from -current for newer SSLeay port).

Any one who responds, please observe:

=091) This mail is my *personal* view of the things. It is not=20
=09   sanctioned by anyone, inc. the FreeBSD core group. Even=20
=09   information on the 2.1.6 release is unofficial - I just saw it=20
=09   mentioned in the -hackers mailing list in the mails of some=20
=09   persons.=20
=092) I don't want a flame war and won't answer to any flames. I=20
=09   hope to keep this all in reasonable frame.=20
=093) IMHO I am not much of an organizer :-) and so not too suitable=20
=09   for carrying it all through. As d=B4for contributing I can=20
=09   provide my own time and disk space which is located over a not too=20
=09   good link in a far a way place in Europe. I can also test any=20
=09   reasonable changes.=20
=094) I do not in any way want to make -stable unstable in any way.=20
=09   All changes going in would be tested for stability by several=20
=09   people *before* making it to the official tree. It should be=20
=09   possible to either "group up" several of the deltas to make=20
=09   fewer of them or alternatively, make a lot of them for smaller=20
=09   deltas.=20
=095) Any one who finds this not appropriate for the list, the whole=20
=09   thing pointless, etc. Are welcome to mail me personaly and say so.

=09Sander



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.961017120657.17620D-100000>