Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:39:34 +0100 From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> To: Barney Wolff <barney@pit.databus.com> Cc: "J. W. Ballantine" <jwb@homer.att.com>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: route pointing to a gateway that's not on net Message-ID: <20030316113934.GA30546@gvr.gvr.org> In-Reply-To: <20030315222000.GA40787@pit.databus.com> References: <20030314202944.GA5071@gvr.gvr.org> <200303142117.h2ELHdl21193@akiva.homer.att.com> <20030315214239.GA23489@gvr.gvr.org> <20030315222000.GA40787@pit.databus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why don't we just start all over again. IIRC this is his situation: 1) Local LAN 10.0.0.0/8 2) gateway on that LAN: 10.17.47.37 3) Host X on the LAN that should have an 209.122.66.XXX IP address. I assume here that he controls the 10.17.47.37 gateway. This is what he should do: # give host IP address ifconfig xl0 inet 209.122.66.XXX # make sure host can send packets to 10.* hosts route add -net 10.0.0.0 -iface xl0 # make sure 10.* hosts can send something back # I assume that all 10.* hosts have a deault route to 10.17.47.37 # The following is done on the gatewaym: route add -host 209.122.66.XXX -iface <local interface name> # Okay..now 209.122.66.XXX should be able to reach all 10 hosts # the following should add reachbility of the rest of the world, except # 209.122.66.* route add default 10.17.47.37 at this point he an do what I suggested to give reachability to the other 209.122.66.* hosts -Guido To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030316113934.GA30546>