Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:40:59 -0500
From:      Tom McLaughlin <tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org>
To:        Joe Holden <joe@joeholden.co.uk>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Thoughts: Potential new port(s)
Message-ID:  <1168731659.91224.17.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <45A8CEB2.8060905@joeholden.co.uk>
References:  <45A8CEB2.8060905@joeholden.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 12:21 +0000, Joe Holden wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm creating a port for OpenPBX, however it requires a recent SpanDSP, 
> so I have created spandsp-current to keep inline with development, as 
> Asterisk for one, relies on the patched version of spandsp that is in 
> the ports tree.
> 
> The port has been tested and checks out fine with portlint etc.
> 
> Feedback much appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe

If Asterisk can only work with a specific version of spandsp then maybe
there needs to be an asterisk specific port of comms/spandsp so other
spandsp consumer ports, such as openpbx, can use the latest version via
comms/spandsp.  Also, the patches in the current version of the spandsp
just appear to be build fixes.

Take it up with the asterisk maintainer.

tom

-- 
| tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org             tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org |
| FreeBSD                                   http://www.FreeBSD.org |
| BSD#                    http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:FreeBSD |




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1168731659.91224.17.camel>