Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:15:36 -0800 From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@miralink.com> To: Dieter <freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com> Cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/118093: firewire bus reset hogs CPU, causing data to be lost Message-ID: <4957FA88.1000604@miralink.com> In-Reply-To: <200812260623.GAA20643@sopwith.solgatos.com> References: <200812260623.GAA20643@sopwith.solgatos.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dieter wrote: >>> I confirmed that spl's are complete no-ops since rel 5. So, you want >>> to ignore >>> them as they are just markers now where locking should be implemented. >>> > > I hunted down the spl code, and you're right. Wow, I wonder how drivers > still using spl calls work at all? > > I believe that the spl() calls are just left there as a hint where locking should be. As far as I understand, we need to pay attention to the mutex locks. >> is to real behavior, but /var/log/messages has a tendency to get garbled >> like this: >> >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: fwohci1: Initiate bus reset >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: fwohci1: BUS reset >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: fwohci1: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=8, >> CYCLEMASTER mode >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: firewi >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: re1: >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: 1 n >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: odes >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: , ma >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: xhop >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: <= >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: 0, c >> Dec 22 16:00:18 home-test kernel: able >> > > Do the lines get folded on the console, or only in /var/log/messages? > As far as I can see, the console messages are fine. It's only the messages that get garbled. Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4957FA88.1000604>