Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:51:13 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: =?utf-8?B?0JLQsNC00LjQvCDQn9C10YLRgNGP0LXQsg==?= <vpetryaev@tdnika.ru>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, mezz@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.04_1 Message-ID: <86hbgci1f2.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinyQEFofRKD549fdU7MiPLU7heTpfkpn%2BwcRxhk@mail.gmail.com> (Jeremy Messenger's message of "Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:15:12 -0500") References: <000501cb70fe$e89a6df0$b9cf49d0$@ru> <AANLkTinyQEFofRKD549fdU7MiPLU7heTpfkpn%2BwcRxhk@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> writes: > 2010/10/21 =D0=92=D0=B0=D0=B4=D0=B8=D0=BC =D0=9F=D0=B5=D1=82=D1=80=D1=8F= =D0=B5=D0=B2 <vpetryaev@tdnika.ru>: >> Transmission was two times released after version 2.04 >> https://trac.transmissionbt.com/roadmap?show=3Dcompleted >> >> 10 October released 2.10 and 17 October released 2.11 >> >> May be you need some help for port maintenance? >> >> As I understand, this port require only one patch changes - because patc= hed >> libtransmission/fdlimit.c changed. > > I am not commit the update yet. Transmission have a bad history of > release version that isn't stable enough as you can see they already > have 2.11 in a very short peroid. I am able to reproduce a few of > problems in 2.10 and 2.11. The 2.12 might be released sometimes soon > (just a guess), so I will see how it goes. FYI, 2.04 is not bug-free either $ transmission-remote myhost -a http://foo/bar.torrent myhost:9091 responded: "http error 0: No Response" By waiting you're just trading one bunch of bugs for another. ;\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hbgci1f2.fsf>