Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:36:26 +0200
From:      Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andrea Campi <andrea+freebsd_current@webcom.it>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Is NO_YP_LIBC working?
Message-ID:  <40D851FA.1030103@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040622151128.GA82977@webcom.it>
References:  <20040622151128.GA82977@webcom.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrea Campi wrote:

> in the process of setting up a nanobsd-based system I've stumbled on so
> many issues during a make buildworld that I've started wondering whether
> NO_YP_LIBC is meant to work. Is anybody using it, and do you need local
> changes?

Currently it's broken. Try this patch: 
http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/10039-no-yp-libc.diff

> Another question is what should it actually do. Parts of librpcsvc and
> libwrap call yp_*, as do libexec/{mknetid,ypxfr); it doesn't make sense
> to not compile YP support in libc but try (and fail) to compile these.
> Maybe we should have a single variable (NOYP or NO_YP, I don't care)
> that turns off all YP-only code.

This is exactly what the patch does (or at least it should, I never 
tried it).

Ciao ;-)

-- 
Alex Dupre



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40D851FA.1030103>