Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 15:54:53 +1300 (NZDT) From: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Updating BIND 9 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110071539310.9190-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org> In-Reply-To: <3BBFB81E.C2E3A545@DougBarton.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Doug Barton wrote: > > A) BIND is more than just named. I frequently want to have both versions > of BIND available. B) Don't let your lack of vision prevent you from being > open to learning things beyond your experience. Thanks for the snippy reply, Doug. Not enjoying your weekend, I take it? It's not really fair to consider a scenario whereby a FreeBSD system uses only a single version of BIND (yes, that includes all the binaries and other files), as if the admin is lacking in vision, or is unable to learn, or othersuch nonsense. I run BIND 8.2.5, 9.1.3, and 9.2rc4; even BIND 4 gets a look-in, due to a legacy installation that "mustn't be touched". Of course you should be able to have as many versions of BIND installed as you wish. That is not the issue, and I certainly never mentioned anything to do with it. I just asked for the upgrade path to be better documented. > Congratulations, you're the 89,512nd person to suggest that. Please see > the mail archives for more exciting discussion on the same topic. In any > case this thread is way off topic for -stable, so this'll be my last > comment on it. Thanks, gratuitous flaming like yours is both dull and unnecessary. :-( -- Regards, Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.33.0110071539310.9190-100000>