Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:10:39 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: _fpathconf() and __semctl() prototypes Message-ID: <200302140310.h1E3Adq0041398@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030209224319.C25436-100000@gamplex.bde.org> References: <20030208230626.GA31434@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030209224319.C25436-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 22:47:47 +1100 (EST), Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> said: > _fpathconf() is quite different from __semctl. It is not a syscall. > It is a weak alias for fpathconf() which is prototyped normally in > <unistd.h>. The prototype for fpathconf() should be turned into > a prototype for _fpathconf() by "namespace.h", but statvfs.c is missing > theinclude of <unistd.h> so this doesn't happen. It's there in the version on my machine (rev. 1.2 by tjr dated 2002/09/06). -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302140310.h1E3Adq0041398>