Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:23:45 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.co.yu> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: documentation iso file Message-ID: <45AEB001.2080906@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070117225417.GA702@faust.net> References: <20070117225417.GA702@faust.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig739118C6FA4E49ADFF9DB326 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Zoran Kolic wrote: > I'd like to know, are documentation iso files for amd64 and i386 arch > exactly the same? MD5 is different. I have the one for i386. Should I > get also for amd64 and use it for 64 bit box? In other words, are they > arch specific? The content is arch-independent, although there was one ISO image produced by each architecture's build machine during the release-building process. The different MD5 hashes are probably because of different timestamps or other metadata within the ISO files. You should be able to use any of the doc ISO files regardless of which architecture you actually run. Bruce. --------------enig739118C6FA4E49ADFF9DB326 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFrrAE2MoxcVugUsMRAkGzAKCJHv/gTYU5JUOWzw0W981VXtPSogCgjR4j JNeIuMMzveQGqG8xmr+R1U4= =VZLp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig739118C6FA4E49ADFF9DB326--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45AEB001.2080906>