Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Dec 2001 18:48:24 +0800 (CST)
From:      Yung-Sheng Tang <freebsd@hoolan.org>
To:        Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: UDP checksum error after encapsulating multicast packet
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.10112071840010.97100-100000@hoolan.org>
In-Reply-To: <200112070421.UAA07833@windsor.research.att.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Bill Fenner wrote:

> 
> >However, there does exist one case that have good checksum, no matter I 
> >apply the patch or not.
> 
> Is the local system a member of one or the other of these groups?
> i.e. does it work when the local system is a member, or not, or
> is that not a predictor of the behavior?


Actually, as long as the multicast packet sender does not run on the
same machine with mrouted, everything works correctly. If the packet
is issued from the same machine, it gets udp checksum error after being
encapsulated. That's the whole fact I found till now.





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10112071840010.97100-100000>