Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 22:17:36 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: "Victor A. Salaman" <salaman@teknos.com> Cc: "'Jordan K. Hubbard'" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: openssl in -current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002192215070.8731-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1D45ABC754FB1E4888E508992CE97E4F059CE6@teknos.teknos.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Victor A. Salaman wrote: > Don't remove OpenSSL from the three... put the whole thing there, the whole > openssl distro in the tree. The problem with the patent is not that you > CAN'T get the software, the problem is that you can't build with it and use > it. But nobody said that you can't have it in the system. It's up to the > USA_RESIDENT variable that RSAREF would be built (over the net). The only > thing we would need to do is modify sysinstall if you are a USA resident > with a disclaimer screen. That way we put the responsability onto the user, > not the FreeBSD group. This doesn't help. The RSA source not being there isn't the problem, the problem is that there are two different binary versions depending on how you build it (with rsaref or not). Source code builds aren't a problem, they already work fine, it's people who install binary snapshots (e.g. from the CD). Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0002192215070.8731-100000>