Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:20:57 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, current@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Not committing WARNS settings... Message-ID: <20020206092057.D96921@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200202061112.g16BCis55559@greenpeace.grondar.org>; from mark@grondar.za on Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:12:38AM %2B0000 References: <xzpwuxq7upy.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200202061112.g16BCis55559@greenpeace.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:12:38AM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > IMO, this is a good reason to not have WARNS contain -Werror at this > time. NO_WERROR is a good way to fix this (again IMO). I see a great > need to let warnings "hang out", and in an ideal world I see an need > for (new) warnings to break things. I see no need for warnings to > hold back a project as important as GCC3, and NO_WERROR is the > cleanest solution. > > I do not expect others to agree with (or like) this. I do not. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020206092057.D96921>