Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 03:11:44 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@nomad.mt.sri.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Mark Newton <newton@camtech.com.au>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSDI executables Message-ID: <199803181011.DAA00841@nomad.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <4047.890178584@time.cdrom.com> References: <199803172330.KAA26028@frenzy.ct> <4047.890178584@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I've told a colleague that the -Q option to ld still works under 2.2.5, > > and will generate an executable which stands a better-than-even chance > > of running under BSD/OS 2.0 from BSDI. > > I don't believe that BSD/OS 2.0 is capable of running any sort of > FreeBSD binaries now, linked with -Q or otherwise. Actually, if you put all the FreeBSD shlibs onto a recent BSDi box, it will run non-kernel binaries fine. Some things don't work (JDK didn't work, but tcsh, kaffe, and ssh worked fine). Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803181011.DAA00841>