Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:40:46 +0100 From: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> To: Doug Sampson <dougs@dawnsign.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP USB 2.0 Tape Drive Message-ID: <20091210174046.GA386@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <D05FCB8B5D9E904981802903D84EEFEF3D66@hydra.dawnsign.com> References: <D05FCB8B5D9E904981802903D84EEFEF3D66@hydra.dawnsign.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:50:04PM -0800, Doug Sampson wrote: > Does anyone have had positive or negative experience using these USB-based > DAT tape drives? Specifically, I am looking at the HP (Hewlett-Packard) > StorageWorks Q1581SB DAT 160 Tape Drive. If there are other branded USB > 2.0-based tape drives (i.e. Quantum) that you've used with little or no > problems, I would be interested in knowing about these. Apparently the umass driver supports at least some models, they are reported as sa(4) devices; see http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-November/104550.h= tml=20 I don't know if the speed problems in abovementioned message still exist. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkshMp4ACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVKcgCdEauH/S1C4uD/XCoFI9CMbnwF CS8An1DM73Kb2sGSWaZf9f3SZw4mBPJA =QXbC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091210174046.GA386>