Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:22:07 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <agapon@cv-nj.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipsec & ipfw: 4.7-release vs -stable Message-ID: <20030210192207.GC5292@opus.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030210114213.P53494@edge.foundation.invalid> References: <20030210114213.P53494@edge.foundation.invalid>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:43:04AM -0500, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Is there any remedy expected before 4.8 release for the situation with > ipsec & ipfw interaction that was created after 'ip_input.c 1.130.2.40, > MFC: 1.214' ? > > The reason I am asking this question with such a big crosspost is that it > seems that all previous discussions on this topic resulted in nothing. And > this change definetely breaks things for those who use ipsec without extra > stuff like gif tunnels. It definetely doesn't look like a kind of change > welcomed in -stable branch, not mentioning a potential security > vulnaribity for those who can not use gif. > > I apologize in the case I have missed any latest developments in this > area. Hello Andriy, What is the problem you are having, exactly? What is the `potential security vulnaribity'? Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030210192207.GC5292>