Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 May 2014 17:11:29 +0200
From:      Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To:        Ports FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Java wildfly port
Message-ID:  <20140508151129.GE2341@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <E58840F0-16AD-4BAC-A0D0-4077B3C52D61@liwest.at>
References:  <CAPJF9wmqF_p=KYMPecfjS9JRdLSxP58oY3ARZ2djMaey2oci4Q@mail.gmail.com> <6B2116F3-83DB-455D-88A0-18072E5AD490@liwest.at> <CAPJF9wk=xOJnZJyifieaVSCTRMGJ5JrjBuLqFdq=8hGdV9ZTYA@mail.gmail.com> <E58840F0-16AD-4BAC-A0D0-4077B3C52D61@liwest.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

The problem I'm thinking about is that the port after startup
writes all over it's install directory, which makes it difficult
to deinstall and/or upgrade.

I would prefer to seperate the programs from the user-supplied
or temporary data or logs so that a port deinstall/reinstall or
upgrade does not interfere with the data.

Alexander told me that with 8.0.0 that's difficult to achieve,
and maybe we accept this for now. Still thinking...

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         6 years to go !



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140508151129.GE2341>