Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:43:58 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/vinum vinumdaemon.c Message-ID: <20030423073405.E19214@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200304221945.h3MJjQSg024837@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200304221945.h3MJjQSg024837@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > jhb 2003/04/22 12:45:26 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/dev/vinum vinumdaemon.c > Log: > Keep the proc locked while we set PS_INMEM so that either of the proc lock > or sched_lock are sufficient to test this flag. > > XXX: vinum should really be using a kernel process via kthread_create() > instead of this hack. I'm not even sure PS_INMEM can be clear at this > point anyways. I think PS_INMEM is always set for curproc, since curproc couldn't run without a stack. vinumdaemon also hacks on P_SYSTEM, which should keep PS_INMEM from changing later. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030423073405.E19214>